International mobility for administrative staff

by jguiver on 29/08/2012

I recently wrote an article for QS AIM which they gave the title, ‘Improving the student experience: The importance of international administrative staff’.  In it, I tried to explain why I thought professional administrators in international higher education should have as much chance in their careers to be internationally mobile as academics.  Academics have plenty of opportunity to teach almost anywhere in the world, but jobs for higher education administrators who want to work outside of their home country are fewer and further between.

My article sparked a thoughtful discussion on Linked In: Would hiring international administrative staff be key to improve the experience of international students?  I read through people’s comments with interest, and I wanted to respond to a couple of the comments here.  I wrote the article mostly as a way to vent my frustration at not being able to find job opportunities for someone with my experience and skills that would advance my career.  I have over twelve years’ professional administrative experience in international education, but outside of the UK or USA (both places where I am legally able to work), I will struggle to get hired because of the difficulties in obtaining a work permit in most countries.  I think universities just don’t want to bother filling administrative positions with people who require permits; however, they are willing to hire academics from other countries because of the prestige and because it will boost their ranking.  Administrative staff don’t seem to be valued in the same way, to the detriment of the student experience.

In the first comment on the Linked In discussion, the question is asked ”How are institutions defining ‘international’ in this context?”  Essentially, I meant a higher education professional who was seeking a job outside of their home country; for example, an American looking for work in France, a Nigerian seeking employment in China or an Australian trying to get a job in Mexico.  Let’s assume all of these job-seekers are experienced, well-travelled, have good cross-cultural awareness/communication/sensitivity, and have the ‘right’ kind of skills and background working in international higher education in administrative positions.  Any of them would bring a great deal to a college or university and would contribute to the success of the international student experience, but because of their nationality, they won’t get a job interview because priority is given to a local candidate.  I understand the reasons why this happens (HR, legal, work permits, etc), but it isn’t always in the best interest of the students.

A mix of local and ‘international’, ie. non-local, administrative staff can add immensely to the international student experience at an institution by bringing different perspectives to the table.  I work in the International Office at a university in the UK, but I’m not British.  I have a colleague who is from China and another who’s American, but the rest of my colleagues are British.  The three of us non-Brits think differently from our British colleagues; we suggest ideas and ways of doing things that might not otherwise be explored.  If there are issues with an American or Chinese student, we are able to see it from the student’s perspective and perhaps contribute to a solution that might not otherwise be found.  I’m not saying we are special or indispensable, but I’d like to think that our office is more effective at providing a well-rounded international student experience because of our points of view.

In the discussion on Linked In, someone else commented, “I think mere recruitment of International staff would not help…We cannot expect them to empathize with the students just because they come from a different culture.”  I would agree with that, and mere recruitment of international staff is not what I am suggesting.  I’m suggesting international higher education administrative staff with years’ worth of professional experience working with students of many nationalities should have the same opportunities to work around the world as academics.  I’m suggesting that a mix of local and non-local staff in an institution’s international office would contribute positively to the international student experience by bringing different perspectives to the development of the programme.

LinkedInFacebookStumbleUponShare

{ 6 comments… read them below or add one }

Marie Heraughty August 30, 2012 at 4:39 pm

Thanks for explaining the rationale behind the discussion. With regards to an earlier contribution on the LinkedIn, I think it is wisest to hire to best person for the job. I once hired an international staff member solely on this basis although sadly in the end the position was cut but that’s another story. The candidate would undoubtedly have brought new perspectives and much more. However advocating more international opportunities for international administrators is worth promoting. It seems to me that there is still some way to go in this area and that perhaps it is early days yet. Many institutions still have a long road ahead in understanding what ‘internationalisation’ is about and opportunities are usually linked to the priorities of an institution.

Reply

jguiver August 30, 2012 at 7:49 pm

Hi Marie

Thanks for your comment. Totally agree that it’s wisest to hire the best person for the job. But the sad truth is that sometimes the best person for the job is someone non-local, ie. a foreigner who requires a work permit, and therefore that person doesn’t get hired. It would be great if this general hiring attitude would change! As you said, it’s early days and perhaps as internationalization of institutions becomes more widespread, more opportunities will become available for non-locals.

Thanks for reading!
Jessica

Reply

Sarah August 30, 2012 at 6:19 am

I feel as though I could have written this post!

I am a study abroad professional that has spent years networking and building niche skills (much like an academic) to be one of the very lucky few to be sponsored by my employer. I am an American now working at a university in Australia.

There have been others with similar experience that have come after me, seeking jobs in Australia and after a few months they had to use their return flights home. Obtaining a job overseas is very much serendipity coupled with skill and passion. In these times where attending university involves so much more than time spent in the classroom, I strongly agree that professional administrators should be as respected as academics and given similar opportunities both for employment and professional development.

Reply

jguiver August 30, 2012 at 11:28 am

Hi Sarah

Thanks for commenting. It sounds like you managed to secure a wonderful opportunity! It’s good to get your insight as someone who’s ‘been there, done that’.

All the best to you!
Jessica

Reply

Peter August 29, 2012 at 6:51 pm

I agree with the argument here, but am a little uncomfortable with the comment that: “The three of us non-Brits think differently from our British colleagues; we suggest ideas and ways of doing things that might not otherwise be explored.” Everyone thinks differently and I don’t think nationality comes into it. To imply that British colleagues have a set way of thinking is a little dangerous I think.

Reply

jguiver August 29, 2012 at 7:46 pm

Hi Peter

Thanks for that. I didn’t mean to imply ALL Brits have a set way of thinking. I’ve lived here for over 7 years, so I certainly know that isn’t true. I agree that everyone thinks differently, and my comment is meant to point out that the way I think, my American colleague thinks and my Chinese colleague thinks is different from our British colleagues (and from each other). So we think of things, at times, that perhaps a British colleague wouldn’t have thought of. (the same way a Brit working in an office in the United States would be able to offer a different perspective to her American colleagues) I don’t mean to generalize, but the truth is, that is what happens.

I’m married to a British man, and I can tell you that some of our silliest arguements are because we do have different ideas about things – ideas that definitely stem from our differing cultural backgrounds. The fact that we all think differently is a good case for having people of different backgrounds working in the same office – to bring different perspectives.

Hope that clears it up.
Thanks for commenting.
Jessica

Reply

Leave a Comment

CommentLuv badge

Previous post:

Next post: